A Prospective Study Comparing Matta Scoring System And Sf-36 Scoring System In Assessing Patient Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment Of Acetabulum Fractures
|IJOCP | Volume – 2015| Issue – 2015| Article ID – 2015:49
Conference: Poona Orthopaedic Society Annual Conference POSAC-2015, India [Click for Full details]
Authors: Omkar Sadigale, Atul Patil, Raja Bhaskar, Parag Sancheti, Ashok Shyam
Authors Affiliations: Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
Address of correspondence: email@example.com
Purpose of the study :
Our study aims to compare and study the relation between the Matta scoring system and SF 36 system in assessing the functional outcome of operated acetabular fractures .
This study was conducted between June 2012 to December 2014 .44 patients (between 2012 and 2014) with a mean age of 42.9(+ 3.2)years who were operated for acetabular fractures were selected and followed for a period of 1 year. MCS and PCS components of SF 36 scoring and the functional outcome score of Matta were compared for all these patients. Co-relation was assessed using Pearson’s co-efficient.
There was weak correlation and negative correlation respectively while comparing the Functional outcome score of Matta with the PCS (R2 =0.084) and MCS(R2=0.011) component of SF 36 system.
We conclude that there is a poor relation between Matta scoring and SF 36 system in assessing the functional outcome pertaining to operated acetabular fractures. More parameters are necessary in assessing the functional outcome of the patients after any surgical procedure .
|How to Cite this Abstract|
|Sadigale O, Patil A, Bhaskar R, Sancheti P, Shyam A. A Prospective Study Comparing Matta Scoring System And Sf-36 Scoring System In Assessing Patient Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment Of Acetabulum Fractures. International Journal of Conference Proceedings. March 2015;(2015):49|